Vivo iQOO Z7 vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads — 26/100 vs 15/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 SE has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 doesn't.
Vivo iQOO Z7
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Faster charging: 44W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 173g vs 182g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (30/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 72/100)
- Overall rating 15/100
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z7 vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Vivo iQOO Z7 scores 11 points higher (26/100 vs 15/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (83/100 vs 72/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z7 | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 173 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (83/100 vs 72/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z7 or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 SE — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z7 and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 15/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z7 or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z7 over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 SE is a better fit for everyday use.