Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads — 31/100 vs 15/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 SE is thinner (7.6mm vs 8.6mm).
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Faster charging: 80W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (34/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 182g vs 194g
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) scores 16 points higher (31/100 vs 15/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads (34/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a bit better (34/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (72/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 650 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.8×8.6 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a bit better (34/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (39/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (72/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 SE — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 15/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads on camera score (34/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 SE is a better fit for everyday use.