Vivo Y300 GT vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Vivo Y300 GT (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 65/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 GT has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 6800); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,067,824).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y300 GT
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Vivo Y300 GT better?
- Bigger battery: 7620 vs 6800 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 212g vs 224g
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2067824
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 71/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y300 GT vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 22 points higher (87/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y300 GT | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2067824 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7620 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | — | $892 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y300 GT
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y300 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y300 GT
- 7620 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y300 GT and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo Y300 GT by 47.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 GT
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (98/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (87/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 71/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT by 22 points (87/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y300 GT and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo Y300 GT has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y300 GT over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo Y300 GT is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.