Vivo Y300 GT vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Vivo Y300 GT (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 65/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 GT has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 2,067,824).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo Y300 GT

Performance 77
Display 94
Camera 32
Battery 71
Portability 51
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo Y300 GT better?

  • Bigger battery: 7620 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 212g vs 226g

  • Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 2067824
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 71/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo Y300 GT vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 24 points higher (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (97/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (93/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).

Vivo Y300 GT: The Vivo Y300 GT is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo Y300 GT Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2067824 3667711
Geekbench Single 1579 3639
Geekbench Multi 6100 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 3200x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7620 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 90W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 212 g 226 g
Launch price — $999

Camera comparison

Vivo Y300 GT

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Vivo Y300 GT

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Vivo Y300 GT

  • 7620 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo Y300 GT and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo Y300 GT MediaTek Dimensity 8400
65/100
2067824 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +43.6%
3667711 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Vivo Y300 GT by 43.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo Y300 GT

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

$999

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (97/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (93/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 71/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo Y300 GT and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Vivo Y300 GT has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Vivo Y300 GT over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Vivo Y300 GT is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.