Vivo Y300 GT vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Vivo Y300 GT (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 65/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 GT has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 7500); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 2,067,824).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y300 GT
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
What makes Vivo Y300 GT better?
- Bigger battery: 7620 vs 7500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 212g vs 219g
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 2067824
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (89/100 vs 71/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y300 GT vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 23 points higher (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (87/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (89/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 GT and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y300 GT | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2067824 | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7620 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 159 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5500 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y300 GT
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.69
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y300 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y300 GT
- 7620 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y300 GT and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Vivo Y300 GT by 48.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 GT
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (98/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 GT is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (87/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT (89/100 vs 71/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 GT and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 GT by 23 points (88/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y300 GT and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo Y300 GT has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y300 GT or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y300 GT over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo Y300 GT is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.