Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 64/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,991,672); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 255g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1991672
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 230g vs 255g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 77/100)
What makes Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 27 points higher (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 1991672 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO OLED+ | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1916x2160 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 161.2×143.3×5.3 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 255 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO OLED+
- Resolution: 1916x2160
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 by 113.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (99/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (96/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a better fit for active users.