Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 3

The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 64/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,991,672); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 255g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Performance 77
Display 77
Camera 42
Battery 64
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1991672
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 230g vs 255g

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 77/100)
What makes Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W

  • Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 27 points higher (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3: The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Ultra Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 4247433 1991672
Geekbench Single 3640 2004
Geekbench Multi 11033 5311
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 8.0" Foldable LTPO OLED+
Resolution 3168x1440 1916x2160
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 100W 67W
Wireless charging 40W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm 161.2×143.3×5.3 mm
Weight 230 g 255 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 20MP
42
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
  • 8.0" Foldable LTPO OLED+
  • Resolution: 1916x2160
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
77
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • Wireless: 50W
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100
4247433 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
64/100 -113.3%
1991672 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 by 113.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (99/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 (85/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Mix Fold 3?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 is a better fit for active users.