Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro

The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865; launch prices were $950 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 57/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 980,370).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro by 34 points (91/100 vs 57/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
Performance 60
Display 76
Camera 48
Battery 54
Portability 41
Value for money 40
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 980370
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1168
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3431
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 76/100)
What makes Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 218g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $950

  • Better portability (41/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 34 points higher (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro — 40/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro (85/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro: The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Ultra Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
AnTuTu 4247433 980370
Geekbench Single 3640 1168
Geekbench Multi 11033 3431
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 3168x1440 2400x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 33W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 200 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 10
NFC yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 230 g 218 g
Launch price $950 $500
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
  • Main: 108MP f/1.69
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 20MP
48
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
76
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • Wireless charging: no data
54
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100
4247433 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
57/100 -333.2%
980370 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro by 333.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
$500

Launch price difference: $450. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro (99/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro (96/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro (85/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro by 34 points (91/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is a better fit for active users.