Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 34/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.9mm).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 49/100)
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 220g vs 230g
- Better design/ergonomics (25/100 vs 12/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 53 points higher (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS leads (55/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (96/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (77/100 vs 49/100). In the "design" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a bit better (25/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, Joy UI 12.8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 163.7×76.2×9.9 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 220 g | |
| Price | $950 | — |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 5MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (96/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (77/100 vs 49/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a bit better (25/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS by 53 points (87/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a better fit for everyday use.