Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 50/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 48 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 859,084); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro doesn't; the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 230g).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 859084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1031
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2864
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 24/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 205g vs 230g
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (47/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 41 points higher (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro (85/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 859084 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1031 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2864 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 27W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 9.0 (Pie) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 163.6×75.0×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 205 g | |
| Price | $10498 | — |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro by 394.4% in our overall performance rating.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro (85/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro by 41 points (91/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro — 50/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.