Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 14 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $950 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 79/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,354,148); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 149); the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2354148
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2250
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 7200
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5300 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $999
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 80/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 77/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Xiaomi 14 Ultra better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 224g vs 230g
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 14 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 12 points higher (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 80/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 14 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Ultra (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Ultra (96/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 14 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 2354148 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 2250 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 7200 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5300 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | 149 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 161.4×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 14 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 14 Ultra by 80.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $49. Vivo X300 Ultra was $49 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Ultra (99/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Ultra (96/100 vs 80/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 14 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 14 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 80/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 14 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.