Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14 Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 14 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $950 and $680. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 79/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4880); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,402,307).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2402307
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2200
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 7100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4880 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 77/100)
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 223g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $680 vs $950
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (40/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 14 Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 12 points higher (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 14 Pro — 70/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Pro (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 14 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 2402307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2200 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 7100 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4880 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 161.4×75.3×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $680 |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.42
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- 4880 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 14 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 14 Pro by 76.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $270. Xiaomi 14 Pro was $270 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14 Pro (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 14 Pro — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 14 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 14 Pro — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 14 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 14 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.