Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13 Pro

The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 13 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $950 and $790. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 74/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4820); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,770,620); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 136).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13 Pro — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Performance 76
Display 90
Camera 70
Battery 76
Portability 37
Value for money 60
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1770620
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4820 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Xiaomi 13 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 229g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $790 vs $950

  • Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 13 Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 17 points higher (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 70/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 13 Pro — 60/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Pro (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Pro (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 13 Pro: The Xiaomi 13 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Ultra Xiaomi 13 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 4247433 1770620
Geekbench Single 3640 2004
Geekbench Multi 11033 5311
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 3168x1440 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 4820 mAh
Charging 100W 120W
Wireless charging 40W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 170 136
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 1900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm 162.9×74.6×8.4 mm
Weight 230 g 229 g
Launch price $950 $790
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Xiaomi 13 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
70
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Xiaomi 13 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Xiaomi 13 Pro
  • 4820 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
76
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 13 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100
4247433 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
74/100 -139.9%
1770620 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 13 Pro by 139.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Xiaomi 13 Pro
$790

Launch price difference: $160. Xiaomi 13 Pro was $160 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Pro (99/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Pro (96/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13 Pro — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 13 Pro — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 13 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.