Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13 Lite

The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 13 Lite (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; launch prices were $950 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 54/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 840,330); the Xiaomi 13 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite by 37 points (91/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Performance 55
Display 80
Camera 40
Battery 42
Portability 84
Value for money 46
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 840330
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1039
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2885
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Xiaomi 13 Lite better?
  • Lighter: 171g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $950

  • Better portability (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 13 Lite, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 37 points higher (91/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 13 Lite — 46/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (85/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 13 Lite: The Xiaomi 13 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Ultra Xiaomi 13 Lite
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
AnTuTu 4247433 840330
Geekbench Single 3640 1039
Geekbench Multi 11033 2885
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.5" AMOLED
Resolution 3168x1440 2400x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 100W 67W
Wireless charging 40W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 12
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP53
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm 159.2×72.7×7.2 mm
Weight 230 g 171 g
Launch price $950 $400
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Xiaomi 13 Lite
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
40
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Xiaomi 13 Lite
  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Xiaomi 13 Lite
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 13 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100
4247433 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
54/100 -405.4%
840330 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 13 Lite by 405.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Xiaomi 13 Lite
$400

Launch price difference: $550. Xiaomi 13 Lite was $550 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (99/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (96/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite (85/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Lite by 37 points (91/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Lite?

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 13 Lite — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Lite?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 13 Lite?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 13 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.