Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Blade A34
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Blade A34 (2024) runs on the Spreadtrum Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 32/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 8 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A34 doesn't; the ZTE Blade A34 is noticeably lighter (185g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Blade A34
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A34 better?
- Lighter: 185g vs 226g
- Better portability (62/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Blade A34, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 56 points higher (88/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A34 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A34 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A34 (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A34 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Blade A34 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Spreadtrum Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 Tiramisu | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 164.0×75.8×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 185 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A34
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A34
- 6.6" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Blade A34
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade A34
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A34 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A34 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A34 (81/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A34 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A34?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A34 by 56 points (88/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Blade A34?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Blade A34 — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A34?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Blade A34?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.