Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Blade A32
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Blade A32 (2022) runs on the Spreadtrum Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 23/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 5 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A32 doesn't; the ZTE Blade A32 is noticeably lighter (110g vs 226g).
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Blade A32
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 42/100)
- Lighter: 110g vs 226g
- Better portability (69/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Blade A32, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 64 points higher (87/100 vs 23/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A32 (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A32 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A32 (81/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A32 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Blade A32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Spreadtrum Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 3269794 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 5.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 5 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 148.0×71.8×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 110 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A32
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A32
- 5.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Blade A32
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A32
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A32 (84/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A32 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A32 (81/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A32 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A32?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A32 by 64 points (87/100 vs 23/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Blade A32?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the ZTE Blade A32 — 23/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A32?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Blade A32?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A32 is a better fit for everyday use.