Vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14T

The Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 14T (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra; launch prices were $889 and $449. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 69/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,559,755); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 134); the Xiaomi 14T is noticeably lighter (195g vs 229g).

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 14T — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo X200 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 86

Xiaomi 14T

Performance 68
Display 93
Camera 68
Battery 53
Portability 64
Value for money 62

What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1559755
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1256
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 4207
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 67W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 68/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 53/100)

What makes Xiaomi 14T better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 195g vs 229g
  • Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $889

  • Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 34/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X200 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 14T, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 17 points higher (86/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100, Xiaomi 14T — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14T and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T (93/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).

Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 14T: The Xiaomi 14T is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo X200 Ultra Xiaomi 14T
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
AnTuTu 3092340 1559755
Geekbench Single 3100 1256
Geekbench Multi 10095 4207
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 3168x1440 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 90W 67W
Wireless charging 40W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 167 134
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / OriginOS 5 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm 160.5×75.1×7.8 mm
Weight 229 g 195 g
Launch price $889 $449

Camera comparison

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera

Xiaomi 14T

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
68
camera

Display comparison

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Xiaomi 14T

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display

Battery and charging

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery

Xiaomi 14T

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 14T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100
3092340 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
69/100 -98.3%
1559755 AnTuTu

Vivo X200 Ultra leads Xiaomi 14T by 98.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo X200 Ultra

$889

Xiaomi 14T

$449

Launch price difference: $440. Xiaomi 14T was $440 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T (92/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 14T and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T (93/100 vs 68/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 14T (78/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 14T significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14T?

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 14T — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Xiaomi 14T?

The Vivo X200 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Xiaomi 14T — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14T?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 68/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Xiaomi 14T?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X200 Ultra over the Xiaomi 14T?

The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 14T is a better fit for active users.