Vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $889 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 86/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 3,092,340); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 166).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X200 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $999
- Overall rating 86/100
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10095
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 226g vs 229g
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 92/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (40/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X200 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 3 points higher (89/100 vs 86/100). Value score: Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 93/100. In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (40/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X200 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3092340 | 3600724 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10095 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 167 | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $889 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 14.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $110. Vivo X200 Ultra was $110 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 93/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (40/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X200 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.