Vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
The Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $889 and $825. Both devices score the same overall rating of 86/100. Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro has the bigger battery (6300 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,569,354 vs 3,092,340); the Xiaomi 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X200 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Pro
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 10070
- Better camera (93/100 vs 81/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3569354 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3310 vs 3100
- Bigger battery: 6300 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 192g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $825 vs $889
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 92/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
The Vivo X200 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 86/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 81/100). Value score: Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X200 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3092340 | 3569354 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 3310 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10095 | 10070 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2656x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6300 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 167 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | Android 16 / HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | 151.1×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $889 | $825 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2656x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Pro leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 13.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $64. Xiaomi 17 Pro was $64 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
Both devices scored 86/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Xiaomi 17 Pro (95/100 vs 92/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X200 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X200 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.