ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1376 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 75/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5800); the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,290,813 vs 3,092,340).
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3290813 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3211 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10106 vs 10095
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 227g vs 229g
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 65W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1376
- Better camera (93/100 vs 56/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (34/100 vs 33/100)
Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 11 points higher (86/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 67/100). Value score: ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (93/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100).
| Specification | ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3290813 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3211 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10106 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB / 24GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / ROG UI | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.8×8.9 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1376 | $889 |
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 6.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $487. Vivo X200 Ultra was $487 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (93/100 vs 56/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100).
Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 56/100).
Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.