ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1376 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 75/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,290,813).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro

Performance 93
Display 89
Camera 56
Battery 67
Portability 33
Value for money 60

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 227g vs 230g

  • Overall rating 75/100

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3290813
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3211
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10106
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 65W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1376

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 93/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 33/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 16 points higher (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 67/100). Value score: ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro — 60/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (96/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (85/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 33/100).

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro: The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3290813 4247433
Geekbench Single 3211 3639
Geekbench Multi 10106 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2400x1080 3168x1440
Refresh rate 185 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5800 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 65W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 32 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB / 24GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / ROG UI Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 163.8×76.8×8.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 227 g 230 g
Launch price $1376 $950

Camera comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 32MP
  • Front: 32MP
56
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
89
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro

  • 5800 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • Wireless: 15W
67
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3290813 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +22.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro by 22.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro

$1376

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $426. Vivo X300 Ultra was $426 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (96/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro (85/100 vs 67/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 33/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 56/100).

Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 93/100).

Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The ASUS ROG Phone 9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.