Vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $889 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 86/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 3,092,340); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 167).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $899
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 10095
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 226g vs 229g
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 93/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X200 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 2 points higher (88/100 vs 86/100). Value score: Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X200 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3092340 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10095 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 167 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $889 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X200 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 7.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $10. Vivo X200 Ultra was $10 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X200 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Should you choose the Vivo X200 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.