Vivo X Fold6 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1900 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 88/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6900); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,455,738); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X Fold6
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better portability (100/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3455738
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6900 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1900
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 95/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 82/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X Fold6 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 3 points higher (91/100 vs 88/100). Value score: Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (100/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X Fold6 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3455738 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6900 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1900 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X Fold6 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo X Fold6 by 18.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $950. Vivo X300 Ultra was $950 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (100/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X Fold6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Vivo X Fold6 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X Fold6 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X Fold6 has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X Fold6 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X Fold6 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.