Vivo X Fold6 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1900 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 86/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 3,092,340); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.7mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X Fold6
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 3092340
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 10095
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 92/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1900
- Better camera (93/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X Fold6 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 2 points higher (88/100 vs 86/100). Value score: Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (100/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X Fold6 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3455738 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 10095 | |
| Display | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6900 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1900 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X Fold6 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 11.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1011. Vivo X200 Ultra was $1011 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (100/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X Fold6 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X Fold6 edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X Fold6 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X Fold6 has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X Fold6 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X Fold6 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.