Vivo X Fold5 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X Fold5 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1160 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 77/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,345,563); the Vivo X Fold5 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X Fold5
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Vivo X Fold5 better?
- Lighter: 217g vs 230g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2345563
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1160
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 76/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X Fold5 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 14 points higher (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 74/100). Value score: Vivo X Fold5 — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold5 (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold5 (96/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold5 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X Fold5 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2345563 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2200x2480 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP58 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1160 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X Fold5
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X Fold5
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X Fold5
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X Fold5 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo X Fold5 by 44.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $210. Vivo X300 Ultra was $210 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold5 (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold5 (96/100 vs 74/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 76/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold5 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X Fold5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X Fold5 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X Fold5 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X Fold5 has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X Fold5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 74/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X Fold5 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X Fold5 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X Fold5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.