Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $320 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 69/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,391,144); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro

Performance 81
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 76
Portability 54
Value for money 74

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 206g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $320 vs $899

  • Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2391144
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2072
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6649
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 76/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 19 points higher (88/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro — 74/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro: The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2391144 3326259
Geekbench Single 2072 3293
Geekbench Multi 6649 10243
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 1260x2800
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 120W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4400 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 206 g 226 g
Launch price $320 $899

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
76
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
69/100
2391144 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +28.1%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro by 28.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro

$320

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $579. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro was $579 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (96/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 76/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 81/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.