vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 76/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,825,187); the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2825187
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2797
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 8767
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6100 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 72/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 12 points higher (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 72/100). In the "portability" category, the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2825187 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2797 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8767 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6100 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×75.4×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
- 6100 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) by 15.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 72/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.