Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $229 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 52/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (165g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
Performance 39
Display 93
Camera 37
Battery 58
Portability 94
Value for money 62
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 165g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $950

  • Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (94/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2100
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 39 points higher (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (94/100 vs 39/100).

Tecno Spark 40 Pro+: The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 4247433
Geekbench Single 750 3640
Geekbench Multi 2100 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1224x2720 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 33W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
NFC yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 165 g 230 g
Launch price $229 $950
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2720
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • Wireless: 15W
58
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
$229
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $721. Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ was $721 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (99/100 vs 39/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (96/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (85/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (94/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.