Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $229 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 52/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (165g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 165g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $950
- Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (94/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 39 points higher (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (94/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 165 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $229 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $721. Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ was $721 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (99/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (85/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (94/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.