Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova Slim leads — 32/100 vs 29/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4500); the Tecno Pova Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 194g).
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 156g vs 194g
- Better camera (26/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 39/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 57/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Overall rating 29/100
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Tecno Pova Slim scores 3 points higher (32/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 550018 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Tecno Pova Slim edges out the Vivo Y77 (China) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.