Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova Slim leads — 32/100 vs 31/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 194g).
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 156g vs 194g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 39/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 57/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (34/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China), the Tecno Pova Slim scores 1 points higher (32/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a bit better (34/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (100/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 550018 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 650 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 164.0×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a bit better (34/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (100/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Tecno Pova Slim edges out the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads on camera score (34/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.