Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova Slim leads — 32/100 vs 31/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5160); the Tecno Pova Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't; the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 203g).
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 156g vs 203g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 46/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5160 mAh
- Better camera (27/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Tecno Pova Slim scores 1 points higher (32/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (100/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 550018 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 203 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (100/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Tecno Pova Slim edges out the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.