Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 32/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Tecno Pova Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 175g).
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4600 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 156g vs 175g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 37/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 81/100)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (37/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro scores 1 points higher (33/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (37/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (100/100 vs 81/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 550018 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (100/100 vs 81/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro edges out the Tecno Pova Slim by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 26/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.