Tecno Pova Curve vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $219 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 58/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).
Tecno Pova Curve
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $899
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 29 points higher (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve — 76/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova Curve | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $219 | $899 |
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Pova Curve and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova Curve by 73.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $680. Tecno Pova Curve was $680 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (93/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (96/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 29 points (87/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Curve has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.