Tecno Pova Curve vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $219 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 58/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 879,714); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Curve
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $899
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 30 points higher (88/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve — 72/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Curve | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $219 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Curve and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova Curve by 73.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $680. Tecno Pova Curve was $680 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (96/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 30 points (88/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Curve has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.