Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $250 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 53/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 573,460); the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Pova 6 Pro better?
- Lighter: 198g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $950
- Better portability (61/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 573460
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 70W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 38 points higher (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Tecno Pova 6 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (85/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (61/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 6 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.5×76.1×7.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Pova 6 Pro by 86.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $700. Tecno Pova 6 Pro was $700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (99/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (96/100 vs 46/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (85/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (61/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro by 38 points (91/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 46/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 6 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.