Tecno Camon iACE2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon iACE2 (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 22/100 (a 69-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3050); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon iACE2 doesn't; the Tecno Camon iACE2 is noticeably lighter (150g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon iACE2
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon iACE2 better?
- Lighter: 150g vs 230g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3050 mAh
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon iACE2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 69 points higher (91/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon iACE2 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 11047 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3050 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 148.3×71.9×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 150 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon iACE2
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon iACE2
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon iACE2
- 3050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon iACE2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon iACE2 by 96.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon iACE2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (99/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (89/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (85/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon iACE2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 by 69 points (91/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon iACE2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon iACE2 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon iACE2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon iACE2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.