Tecno Camon 50 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 50 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $180 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 52/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6150); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Tecno Camon 50 is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 50 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $950
- Better display (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6150 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 39 points higher (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 — 70/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50
- 6150 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $770. Tecno Camon 50 was $770 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (99/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (58/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.