Tecno Camon 17 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio G95, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 46/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 534,895); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Camon 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Better portability (47/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 534895
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 673
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1881
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 17 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 45 points higher (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (89/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 17 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G95 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 534895 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 673 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1881 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 48 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.9×77.0×9.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 48MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Camon 17 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 17 Pro by 87.4% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (99/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (89/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (96/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro (85/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 17 Pro by 45 points (91/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 17 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 51/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 17 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.