Tecno Camon 16 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 16 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio G70, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 39/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 317,084); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 16 doesn't; the Tecno Camon 16 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 16
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 16 better?
- Lighter: 207g vs 230g
- Better portability (42/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 317084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 417
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1345
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 16 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 52 points higher (91/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (99/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (89/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 16 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 16 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 317084 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 417 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1345 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 16
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 16
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 16 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 16 by 92.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 16
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (99/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (89/100 vs 37/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 16 and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 by 52 points (91/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 16 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 16 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 16 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 16 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.