Tecno Camon 12 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 12 Pro (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 25/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 177,554); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Camon 12 Pro is noticeably lighter (161g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 12 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 12 Pro better?
- Lighter: 161g vs 230g
- Better portability (84/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 19/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 12 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 66 points higher (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (99/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (96/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 12 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); HIOS 5.5 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.6×75.5×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 161 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 12 Pro
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 12 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 12 Pro
- 3500 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 12 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 12 Pro by 95.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 12 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (99/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (89/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (96/100 vs 19/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro (85/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 12 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (84/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 12 Pro by 66 points (91/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 12 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 19/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 12 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 12 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.