Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) is priced at $2899, the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) at $105. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 25/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A76 4G doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Cheaper: $105 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 32 points higher (57/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | — | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | — | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | — | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | — | |
| Price | $2899 | $105 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $2794. ZTE Blade A76 4G is cheaper by $2794.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (49/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (52/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G by 32 points (57/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.