Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 28/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 303,398); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo Y32t
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 779
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 20/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 309g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 41 points higher (69/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (90/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (70/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 779 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo Y32t by 864.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (90/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (70/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 41 points (69/100 vs 28/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.