Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 11/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo Y32t
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 46 points higher (57/100 vs 11/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | — | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $2899 | — |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (49/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 46 points (57/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.