Tecno Camon 16 S vs Vivo Y32t
The Tecno Camon 16 S (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). Both devices score the same overall rating of 28/100. Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 156,818).
Tecno Camon 16 S
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (29/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 156818
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 779 vs 723
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 8/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 38/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 32/100)
The Tecno Camon 16 S and the Vivo Y32t received the same MobileRank rating — 28/100. In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S leads (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Tecno Camon 16 S are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (68/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 16 S | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 156818 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 6.2 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.5×76.5×9.0 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Tecno Camon 16 S
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Camon 16 S
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Tecno Camon 16 S
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Tecno Camon 16 S and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Tecno Camon 16 S by 48.3% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 8/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Tecno Camon 16 S are nearly equal (39/100 vs 38/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 16 S is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 16 S (68/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the Vivo Y32t?
Both devices scored 28/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo Y32t.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 16 S and the Vivo Y32t?
The Tecno Camon 16 S has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the Vivo Y32t?
The Tecno Camon 16 S leads on camera score (29/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 16 S or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 8/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 16 S over the Vivo Y32t?
The Tecno Camon 16 S is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.