Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X90 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X90 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X90 Pro leads — 72/100 vs 69/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4870); the main camera is 200 MP vs 3 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,781,240); the Vivo X90 Pro is noticeably lighter (214g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo X90 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1781240
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1745
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4351
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4870 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 3MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 73/100)
What makes Vivo X90 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 214g vs 309g
- Better camera (70/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (36/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo X90 Pro, the Vivo X90 Pro scores 3 points higher (72/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X90 Pro leads (70/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro leads (77/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (90/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X90 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X90 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X90 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (36/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X90 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1781240 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1745 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 4351 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4870 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 136 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 3 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 164.1×74.5×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X90 Pro
- Main: 3MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X90 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X90 Pro
- 4870 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo X90 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo X90 Pro by 64.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X90 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (90/100 vs 73/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X90 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X90 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X90 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (36/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Vivo X90 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X90 Pro — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Vivo X90 Pro leads on camera score (70/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 73/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X90 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.