Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X Fold3
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X Fold3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold3 leads — 74/100 vs 69/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,757,044); the Vivo X Fold3 is noticeably lighter (219g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo X Fold3
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 62/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 219g vs 309g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo X Fold3, the Vivo X Fold3 scores 5 points higher (74/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X Fold3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1757044 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 5311 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 160.0×142.7×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X Fold3
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X Fold3
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo X Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo X Fold3 by 66.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X Fold3
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Fold3?
The Vivo X Fold3 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X Fold3 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Fold3?
The Vivo X Fold3 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo X Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.