Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold3

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X Fold3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 83/100 vs 73/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold3 has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,437,807 vs 1,754,213); the Vivo X Fold3 is thinner (4.7mm vs 7.9mm).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X Fold3 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 95
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 74
Vivo X Fold3
Performance 75
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 62
Portability 64
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3437807 vs 1754213
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 5311
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 214g vs 219g

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 60W

  • Longer battery life (62/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo X Fold3, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 10 points higher (83/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X Fold3: The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo X Fold3
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3437807 1754213
Geekbench Single 3601 2004
Geekbench Multi 10686 5311
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 2200x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 60W 80W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 14, OriginOS 4
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 160.0×142.7×4.7 mm
Weight 214 g 219 g
Launch price $1299
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Vivo X Fold3
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Vivo X Fold3
  • 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2200x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Vivo X Fold3
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
62
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo X Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
83/100
3437807 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
73/100 -96.0%
1754213 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Vivo X Fold3 by 96.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299
Vivo X Fold3
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (95/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (64/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X Fold3 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold3?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X Fold3 — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo X Fold3?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.