Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo V25
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo V25 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 52/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 671,241); the Vivo V25 is noticeably lighter (186g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo V25
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 671241
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1003
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2423
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 50/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 69/100)
What makes Vivo V25 better?
- Lighter: 186g vs 309g
- Better portability (69/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo V25, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 17 points higher (69/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo V25 (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo V25 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo V25 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo V25 (63/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V25 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (69/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo V25 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 671241 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1003 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2423 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2404 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 159.2×74.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo V25
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V25
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2404
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo V25
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo V25, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo V25 by 336.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo V25
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo V25 (90/100 vs 50/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo V25 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo V25 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo V25 (63/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V25 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (69/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo V25?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Vivo V25 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo V25?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo V25 — 52/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo V25?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo V25?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.