Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo T5 5G

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo T5 5G (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7500 Turbo; launch prices were $2899 and $235. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 60/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T5 5G has the bigger battery (7050 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,106,227); the Vivo T5 5G is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Vivo T5 5G by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

Vivo T5 5G

Performance 60
Display 94
Camera 40
Battery 60
Portability 60
Value for money 74

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1106227
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1089
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3276
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 60/100)

What makes Vivo T5 5G better?

  • Bigger battery: 7050 vs 5600 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 309g
  • Cheaper at launch: $235 vs $2899

  • Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo T5 5G, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 9 points higher (69/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Vivo T5 5G — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo T5 5G (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo T5 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo T5 5G are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo T5 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo T5 5G: The Vivo T5 5G is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Vivo T5 5G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 7500 Turbo
AnTuTu 2926532 1106227
Geekbench Single 3013 1089
Geekbench Multi 9287 3276
Display 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2160x1584 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5600 mAh 7050 mAh
Charging 45W 44W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 —
Dimensions 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm 164.4×75.3×8.0 mm
Weight 309 g 199 g
Launch price $2899 $235

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Vivo T5 5G

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
40
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Vivo T5 5G

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Vivo T5 5G

  • 7050 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo T5 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100
2926532 AnTuTu
Vivo T5 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7500 Turbo
60/100 -164.6%
1106227 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo T5 5G by 164.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Vivo T5 5G

$235

Launch price difference: $2664. Vivo T5 5G was $2664 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo T5 5G (90/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo T5 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo T5 5G are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo T5 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Vivo T5 5G by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo T5 5G — 60/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo T5 5G is a better fit for active users.