Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo T5 5G

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo T5 5G (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7500 Turbo; launch prices were $1999 and $235. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 60/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T5 5G has the bigger battery (7050 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 1,106,227); the Vivo T5 5G is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Vivo T5 5G — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

Vivo T5 5G

Performance 60
Display 94
Camera 40
Battery 60
Portability 60
Value for money 74

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 1106227
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1089
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 3276
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 60/100)

What makes Vivo T5 5G better?

  • Bigger battery: 7050 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 44W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $235 vs $1999

  • Longer battery life (60/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo T5 5G, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 15 points higher (75/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T5 5G leads (60/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100, Vivo T5 5G — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo T5 5G (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo T5 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo T5 5G (76/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T5 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (60/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo T5 5G: The Vivo T5 5G is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Vivo T5 5G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 7500 Turbo
AnTuTu 3065623 1106227
Geekbench Single 2910 1089
Geekbench Multi 9174 3276
Display 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2184x1968 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 7050 mAh
Charging 25W 44W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 145 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 —
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm 164.4×75.3×8.0 mm
Weight 215 g 199 g
Launch price $1999 $235

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Vivo T5 5G

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
40
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo T5 5G

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Vivo T5 5G

  • 7050 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo T5 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3065623 AnTuTu
Vivo T5 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7500 Turbo
60/100 -177.1%
1106227 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Vivo T5 5G by 177.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Vivo T5 5G

$235

Launch price difference: $1764. Vivo T5 5G was $1764 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo T5 5G (91/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo T5 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo T5 5G (76/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo T5 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (60/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Vivo T5 5G — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo T5 5G — 60/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo T5 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo T5 5G is a better fit for active users.