Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO U1
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO U1 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 39/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 48 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 517,460); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO U1 doesn't; the Vivo iQOO U1 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO U1
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 517460
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1762
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 57/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO U1 better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 309g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO U1, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 30 points higher (69/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (90/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (52/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (63/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO U1 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO U1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 517460 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 1762 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 162.1×76.6×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO U1
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO U1
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO U1
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO U1, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo iQOO U1 by 465.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO U1
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (90/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (52/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (63/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO U1 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 by 30 points (69/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO U1 — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 29/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.