Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Spark 50 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $2899 and $179. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 47/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 50 5G has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 524,785); the Tecno Spark 50 5G is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1980
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 195g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Tecno Spark 50 5G, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 22 points higher (69/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 42/100, Tecno Spark 50 5G — 62/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (70/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G is a bit better (69/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Tecno Spark 50 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 1980 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $179 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Tecno Spark 50 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Tecno Spark 50 5G by 457.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $2720. Tecno Spark 50 5G was $2720 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (91/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (70/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G is a bit better (69/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Spark 50 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G by 22 points (69/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Tecno Spark 50 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Tecno Spark 50 5G — 47/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Spark 50 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Tecno Spark 50 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Tecno Spark 50 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use.