Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1899 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 68/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,347,721); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 239g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Performance 83
Display 78
Camera 65
Battery 39
Portability 52
Value for money 40
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 better?

  • Overall rating 68/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2347721
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 7192
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 207g vs 239g
  • Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $1899

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 65/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 16 points higher (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — 40/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (73/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2347721 3119308
Geekbench Single 2205 3041
Geekbench Multi 7192 9494
Display 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2160x1856 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 130
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 153.5×132.6×5.6 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 239 g 207 g
Launch price $1899 $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
65
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1856
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
68/100
2347721 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +24.7%
3119308 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 by 24.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
$1899
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Launch price difference: $1249. Vivo iQOO 13 was $1249 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (99/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (73/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 65/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.