Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1899 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 68/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 2,456,969); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 239g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 better?
- Overall rating 68/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 2456969
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 239g
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $1899
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 16 points higher (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — 44/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (73/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2456969 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1856 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 153.5×132.6×5.6 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 239 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $1899 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
- 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1856
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 by 22.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1249. Vivo iQOO 13 was $1249 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (99/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (73/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 65/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.